<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Managing Change: Managing People&#8217;s Fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/</link>
	<description>Allticles.com. An ever growing website consists of top quality article colections such as Computer, Technology, Science, Finance, Entertainments, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:05:46 +0330</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>As a human resources professional, over the years I&#039;ve been surprised by some individual&#039;s reactions to a small change.  Eventually I&#039;ve accepted that people react...no matter what the change.  When I made that basic assumption, then I was able to better prepare myself and the managers when communicating any changes to their employees.

I specifically like one point you made...not only communicate the changes, but what is not changing.    What is not being changed provides an anchor for the employee to balance out any anxiety they may have with the change.

Thanks for the post.
Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a human resources professional, over the years I&#8217;ve been surprised by some individual&#8217;s reactions to a small change.  Eventually I&#8217;ve accepted that people react&#8230;no matter what the change.  When I made that basic assumption, then I was able to better prepare myself and the managers when communicating any changes to their employees.</p>
<p>I specifically like one point you made&#8230;not only communicate the changes, but what is not changing.    What is not being changed provides an anchor for the employee to balance out any anxiety they may have with the change.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post.<br />
Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennet Simonton</title>
		<link>http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennet Simonton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allticles.com/managing-change-managing-peoples-fear/#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>People don&#039;t naturally fear change.  They distrust and distrust managers who use the top-down command and control approach to managing people and in that state employees are highly resistant to change.

Top-down concentrates on producing goals, targets, visions, orders and other directives in order to control the workforce and thereby achieve organizational success.   Concentrating on giving direction prevents these managers from doing much of anything else.  Thus top-down treats employees like robots in the &quot;shut up and listen, I know better than you&quot; mode, and rarely if ever listens to them. By so doing this approach ignores every employee&#039;s basic need to be heard and to be respected. This approach also makes top management ignorant of what is really going on in the workplace thus making their directives misguided at best and irrelevant at worst.

In top-down, nobody listens to employee ideas, nobody values their opinions, and nobody gives them any recognition. The only way that the workforce can deal with managers who treat them in this way is to disengage and ignore their behavior. In the workplace this is seen as being sullen, uncommunicative, having a poor attitude, low morale and/or apathy. 

(During my first 12 years of managing people, I used top-down and was never aware of how bad my leadership was. It was not until I started really listening to employees that I began to understand.)

In this way and others, top-down demeans and disrespects employees sending them very negative value standard messages. The standards reflected in this treatment &quot;lead&quot; employees to treat their work, their customers, each other and their bosses with the same level of disrespect they received. No one can become committed to company goals while being treated so poorly.

This is the road to very poor corporate performance as compared to the results that would be achieved using a better approach.  Top-down managers are their own worst enemies because they “lead” employees to the very worst performance.  (In “The Human Side of Enterprise”, author Douglas McGregor named this “Theory X” and named the other extreme “Theory Y”, but he did not provide how to achieve it.)

In order to cause employees to embrace necessary changes and be very high performers who love to come to work, first get rid of all traces of a top-down approach. Everyone wants to do a good job, but don&#039;t want to be ordered around like a robot. 

Next, start treating employees with great respect and not like robots by listening to whatever they want to say when they want to say it and responding in a very respectful manner. Responding respectfully means resolving their complaints and suggestions and answering their questions to their satisfaction as well as yours, but most importantly theirs. It also means providing them more than enough opportunity to voice their complaints, suggestions and questions. Spend your time making your support reflect the very highest standards of all values by resolving their complaints and suggestions thus &quot;leading&quot; toward the very best standards.

And realize that the highest quality and most respectful &quot;direction&quot; is the very least since no one likes to take orders or really needs them except in emergency situations.  Anyone routinely needing extensive orders should not be on your team.

This treatment leads employees to treat their work, their customers, each other and their bosses with great respect.  Listening and responding respectfully also inspires them to unleash their full potential of creativity, innovation and productivity on their work giving them great pride in it and causes them to love to come to work.  In this state, they will be eager not fearful to make needed changes, even to be proactive about change.  This is our natural state.

You will be stunned as I was by the huge amount of creativity, innovation and productivity you have unleashed. To learn how I escaped top-down after using it for 12 years, read an interview of me at
http://www.extensor.co.uk/articles/int_simonton/interview_ben_simonton.html

Best regards, Ben
Author &quot;Leading People to be Highly Motivated and Committed&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don&#8217;t naturally fear change.  They distrust and distrust managers who use the top-down command and control approach to managing people and in that state employees are highly resistant to change.</p>
<p>Top-down concentrates on producing goals, targets, visions, orders and other directives in order to control the workforce and thereby achieve organizational success.   Concentrating on giving direction prevents these managers from doing much of anything else.  Thus top-down treats employees like robots in the &#8220;shut up and listen, I know better than you&#8221; mode, and rarely if ever listens to them. By so doing this approach ignores every employee&#8217;s basic need to be heard and to be respected. This approach also makes top management ignorant of what is really going on in the workplace thus making their directives misguided at best and irrelevant at worst.</p>
<p>In top-down, nobody listens to employee ideas, nobody values their opinions, and nobody gives them any recognition. The only way that the workforce can deal with managers who treat them in this way is to disengage and ignore their behavior. In the workplace this is seen as being sullen, uncommunicative, having a poor attitude, low morale and/or apathy. </p>
<p>(During my first 12 years of managing people, I used top-down and was never aware of how bad my leadership was. It was not until I started really listening to employees that I began to understand.)</p>
<p>In this way and others, top-down demeans and disrespects employees sending them very negative value standard messages. The standards reflected in this treatment &#8220;lead&#8221; employees to treat their work, their customers, each other and their bosses with the same level of disrespect they received. No one can become committed to company goals while being treated so poorly.</p>
<p>This is the road to very poor corporate performance as compared to the results that would be achieved using a better approach.  Top-down managers are their own worst enemies because they “lead” employees to the very worst performance.  (In “The Human Side of Enterprise”, author Douglas McGregor named this “Theory X” and named the other extreme “Theory Y”, but he did not provide how to achieve it.)</p>
<p>In order to cause employees to embrace necessary changes and be very high performers who love to come to work, first get rid of all traces of a top-down approach. Everyone wants to do a good job, but don&#8217;t want to be ordered around like a robot. </p>
<p>Next, start treating employees with great respect and not like robots by listening to whatever they want to say when they want to say it and responding in a very respectful manner. Responding respectfully means resolving their complaints and suggestions and answering their questions to their satisfaction as well as yours, but most importantly theirs. It also means providing them more than enough opportunity to voice their complaints, suggestions and questions. Spend your time making your support reflect the very highest standards of all values by resolving their complaints and suggestions thus &#8220;leading&#8221; toward the very best standards.</p>
<p>And realize that the highest quality and most respectful &#8220;direction&#8221; is the very least since no one likes to take orders or really needs them except in emergency situations.  Anyone routinely needing extensive orders should not be on your team.</p>
<p>This treatment leads employees to treat their work, their customers, each other and their bosses with great respect.  Listening and responding respectfully also inspires them to unleash their full potential of creativity, innovation and productivity on their work giving them great pride in it and causes them to love to come to work.  In this state, they will be eager not fearful to make needed changes, even to be proactive about change.  This is our natural state.</p>
<p>You will be stunned as I was by the huge amount of creativity, innovation and productivity you have unleashed. To learn how I escaped top-down after using it for 12 years, read an interview of me at<br />
<a href="http://www.extensor.co.uk/articles/int_simonton/interview_ben_simonton.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.extensor.co.uk/articles/int_simonton/interview_ben_simonton.html</a></p>
<p>Best regards, Ben<br />
Author &#8220;Leading People to be Highly Motivated and Committed&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

